Legal Opinion

Clark v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-6438PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

The Defendant, Sears, Roebuck & Company has brought this civil rights action before the Court by filing a motion to dismiss both of Plaintiffs Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 and Section 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 claims. For the reasons which follow, the motion is denied.

I. HISTORY OF THE CASE

According to the allegations set forth in the complaint, the Plaintiff, Theodore Clark is “a black individual” who prior to August, 1991 had been “employed by Sears in Philadelphia for approximately twenty-four years as an at-will employee.” Beginning in 1987, Mr.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Saylor v. RidgeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Giusto v. Ashland Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Barrett v. Catacombs PressDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Jackson v. NicolettiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Jairett v. First Montauk Securities Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API