Legal Opinion

State v. Stufflebean

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2018No. ED 105246PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Q: Did [Burke] tell you what [Appellant] was wearing that day?

SCHOENFELD: He said that on that day [Appellant] was wearing a hat-a ball cap, blue jeans and a white shirt.

Q: Did [Burke] say that [Appellant] made any statements about some items being missing from the trailer when they got out there?

SCHOENFELD: He said that [Appellant] had complained about stuff being missing from the trailer ... that's what [Appellant] said he was missing, Coleman fuel.

Unlike Duncan , Burke was asked about his own statements, and the testimony offered by the State presented materially different statements from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. State v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BettsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State of Missouri v. Dashaun WootenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JANTZEN BLAKE STRICKLANDMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. State of Missouri v. Ramon D. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API