Legal Opinion

Burroughs v. Garrett

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1960No. 6602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

Appellee Burroughs instituted this action in replevin to recover a Peterbilt tractor, upon which he held a chattel mortgage, and a Freuhauf trailer, which had been leased by him. Incidentally, when the units were repossessed by the sheriff, the trailer was loaded with grain of the'value of approximately $1,200. Appellant Garrett answered, alleging ownership of both vehicles. Appellant, Royal Tire Service of Amarillo, Inc., intervened, asking judgment of $1,093.44, balance due on the sale of 8 tires to Garrett, and which had been placed on the tractor; or, in the alternative,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Ochoa v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Obodov v. FosterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  5. Allison v. NiehausNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burroughs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Billsie v. BrooksbankDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
  3. Clark v. MorrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Stephen v. PhillipsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. James S. Goydos & Maria E. Martins v. Rutgers, The State University et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API