In re Brown
The Superior Court of New York City
Application for a writ in the nature of a commission de lunático inqui/rendo.
1Opinion of the CourtHofbmah, J.
The question whether this court has jurisdiction to issue such a commission as is sought, and jurisdiction in a number of similar cases distinct from equity authority in an action, has been found to be so novel and unsettled that it has- engaged the consideration of most of the judges. •
The custody of lunatics was not vested in the English court of chancery as such. It was lodged in the crown. That branch of the prerogative might be exercised by any -officer the king thought fit. It was ordinarily delegated to a great officer of state, but not necessarily to the Keeper of the ■Great Seal. A…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- In re MasonNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Ex Parte Higgins v. HoctorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- State ex rel. Paxton v. GuinotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- People ex rel. Sherwood v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1926