Legal Opinion

Flowserve U.S. Inc. v. ITT Corp.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 22, 2014No. 3:14-CV-1706-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds [Dkt. No. 14]. Having considered the pleadings, the Motion to Dismiss, the Response, the Reply, the parties’ other submissions, and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that this case should be dismissed so that it may proceed in Russia. The Motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

This is an action by Plaintiff Flowserve U.S. Inc. (“Flowserve”) against Defendants ITT Corp. (“ITT”) and Gould Pumps, Inc. (“GPI”).1 Complaint ¶¶ 1-3. Flowserve is a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re Air Crash Disaster Near New Orleans, Louisiana on July 9, 1982. Luis Alberto Trivelloni-Lorenzi, and Susanna Electra Trivelloni-Lorenzi v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., Ernesto Serio Pampin Lopez, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of His Deceased Mother Sara E. Lopez De Pampin v. Pan American Airways, Inc., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Latshaw v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API