Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. Parrish

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1926No. Appeal 115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bv

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff sued her stock brokers to recover a loss alleged to have resulted from their failure to execute her instructions to sell certain shares of stock. They filed an affidavit of defense denying her averments of liability and counterclaimed for a balance alleged to be due them. To that counterclaim, plaintiff filed a reply. Defendants then moved for judgment for the amount of their counterclaim for want of a sufficient reply, pursuant to section 17 of the Practice Act, 1915 P. L. 483, providing “When the defendant sets up a set-off or counterclaim, he may move for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SchollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Epstein v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Colonial SEC. Co. v. Levy (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Brennan v. HuberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API