Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Bugbee

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 15, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Assumpsit, general and special. Heard on the report of a referee, December Term, 1883, Caledonia County, Ross, J., presiding. Judgment for the defendant. The special.count set up the material facts, averred that the defendant had a separate estate, created the debt on its faith and credit, and when discovert promised to pay it. Fleas, general issue, Statute of Limitations and coverture at the time of making the alleged promises.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit, general and special. Heard on the report of a referee, December Term, 1883, Caledonia County, Ross, J., presiding. Judgment for the defendant. The special.count set up the material facts, averred that the defendant had a separate estate, created the debt on its faith and credit, and when discovert promised to pay it. Fleas, general issue, Statute of Limitations and coverture at the time of making the alleged promises. The referee found, that the defendant was the daughter of John Bowen and Hannah B. Bowen, who lived on a farm in Concord, owned by Hannah B., who deceased sometime…

1Opinion of the Court

*176The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Powers, J.

It has been assumed in the argument of this case .that the defendant took and held, under the will of her mother, a separate estate in the farm and live stock in question.

The referee in his report says that “The defendant took and had such an interest in said farm as is given by said will; and there was no evidence that she ever had any other interest or title therein”; and that “the defendant’s title to said live stock was such only as said will gave her.”

If, therefore, the defendant had a separate estate in the farm and live stock, it was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Goulding v. . DavidsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Richardson v. Estate of MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
  4. Frary v. BoothSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  5. Vance v. Wells & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1845

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. BertoliSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Peters v. Estate of PoroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  3. In re Nelson's willSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  4. Curtis v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  5. Valentine v. BellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API