Peters v. Estate of Poro
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal from the decision of the commissioners allowing the claim of Christie Peters against the estate of Eugene Poro. Complaint in the common counts. Pleas, the general issue and the statute of limitations. Replication of an agreement by the intestate within the period of the statute of limitations. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1920, Chittenden County, Butter, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion state the case.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is an appeal from the allowance of commissioners on the estate of Eugene Poro. The claim in question was for personal services rendered to the intestate and in the care of intestate’s mother, Christie Poro, and of his brother, Uber Poro. The cause was tried in the court below on a complaint in the common counts, to which the defendant pleaded the statute of limitations and the general issue. During the trial the plaintiff was permitted, against defendant’s objection, to file what was termed a replication counting on an agreement by the intestate, made within the period of the statute of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Rice v. Bennington County Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Andrus v. FosterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1845
- Drown's Guardian v. Chesley's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Boothe v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Spencer v. Potter's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kellum v. Browning's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Hasbrook v. WingateOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Shea v. PiletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Gray v. MarinoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.