Succession of Haley
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Oivil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Ellis, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nicholls, C. J.
Several distinct matters are included in the appeal in this court under the above title, brought up in one and the same transcript.
The executor of the estate having filed a provisional account in which Dr. Formento was placed as a privileged creditor for seven hundred and fifty dollars for medical services rendered to the •deceased, and Dr. Matas for two hundred and fifty dollars, and in which Drs. Larue and Mioton were entirely left out, the parties named filed opposition thereto, Dr. Formento claiming to be a creditor for three…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Cotnam v. WisdomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Anderson v. CaulkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Succession of CottonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Young Bros. v. Succession of Von SchoelerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Houda v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.