Legal Opinion

Houda v. McDonald

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1930No. 22676. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiff, Dr. Houda, seeks recovery from the defendant, Mrs. McDonald, as executrix of the estate of her deceased husband, O. B. McDonald, for medical and surgical services rendered by him to her over a period of several months during the fall of 1928, and up until April, 1929. Mr. McDonald died in July, 1929. Soon thereafter Mrs. McDonald became the duly appointed and qualified executrix under his will. Thus there devolved upon her the administration of both his estate and the estate of their marital community.

Thereupon Dr. Houda presented to Mrs. McDonald, as executrix, his claim for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrell v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Cotnam v. WisdomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Morrissett v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Swift v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Succession of LevitanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mount v. RiechersOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. First Nat. Bank of Beaumont v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. In Re the Estate of JollyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re the Estate of PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Smith v. KneisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API