Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Shlager v. MacNeil Bros.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 4, 1939No. 112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

This complaint is brought under the Act of August 24, 1935, ch. 642, 49 Stat. 794, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270b, against a contractor and his surety upon a payment bond, given pursuant to said statute.

Both defendants have filed motions to dismiss.

The material allegations of the complaint are that the defendant MacNeil Bros. Company entered into a contract with the United States for the removal of the towboat “Plymouth” at. Cape Cod Canal and, in connection with said contract, the defendant MacNeil Bros. Company, as principal, and the Hartford Accident and In*181demnity Company, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Standard Ins. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States Ex Rel. United States Rubber Co. v. Ambursen Dam Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Ramstad Construction Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1961
  2. United States Ex Rel. Owens v. Olympic Marine Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  3. United States Ex Rel. Lanahan Lumber Co. v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API