Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Weis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 1, 1943No. 4-6941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.

Weis, doing business at Wheatley, is a wholesale dealer in oils, gasoline, and other merchandise. Thompson, a citizen of Texas, contracted with Howard, also of Texas, to prospect for oil on Thompson’s lease in Lee county. Bennett owned a drilling rig and authorized Howard to use it. Thompson’s agreement was to pay Howard a specified sum for drilling to a stipulated depth. Thompson also supplied three hundred feet of eight- and ten-inch surface pipe.

Howard engaged orally to maintain the equipment and to pay Bennett half of any net profits that might accrue, all expenses to be borne by Howard.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wagner Supply Co. v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Whittelsey v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  3. Williams v. MagouirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Calatex Oil & Gas Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  5. McNutt v. McNuttSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Westmoreland Manganese Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
  2. Superior Oil Co. v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Seaside Pools, Inc. v. Robert Lee Curtis, Jr., and Sheila Dawn CurtisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API