Root Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Fort Collins
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The City of Fort Collins (City) appeals a declaratory judgment holding that in order for it to require plaintiffs to remove their signs pursuant to its local ordinances it must pay just compensation as that concept is dealt with in condemnation, and that it should follow the procedures outlined in the eminent domain statutes in order to accomplish such removal. More specifically, the trial court held that the City’s Sign Code which allowed plaintiffs a five-year “Amortization Period” to remove their nonconforming signs did not satisfy the just compensation requirement of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Phelps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Howe v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Fort Collins v. Root Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- National Advertising Co. v. Board of AdjustmentColorado Court of Appeals · 1990