Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Gates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 2004No. 02-56818PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed January 20, 2004, is amended. The amended opinion and Judge Silverman’s dissent have been sent for filing.
No subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed in response to the amended opinion.
*482OPINION
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
David Diaz appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Diaz brought suit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, alleging wrongful conviction and incarceration. The district court determined that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Diaz v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Hope for Families & Community Service, Inc. v. WarrenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
- Marina Point Development Associates v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Diaz v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.