Legal Opinion
Marina Point Development Associates v. United States
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 28, 2005No. EDCV041387RRZXPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SANDY STEERS’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
REAL, District Judge.
/. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Marina Point Development Associates (“MPDA”) filed a Complaint against Defendant Sandy Steers and three Forest Service employees 1 alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and 1962(d). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Steers brought a motion to dismiss the action with prejudice for failure to state a claim on the grounds that her alleged actions constituted protected…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Committee to Protect our Agricultural Water v. Occidental Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Hope for Families & Community Service, Inc. v. WarrenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010