Legal Opinion

Hazeltine v. Lyle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1933No. 24778. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondents, as plaintiffs, sued upon two causes of action assigned to them by a co-partnership doing business under a trade name, and at the time of the filing of their complaint they sued out a writ of attachment which, apparently, was duly levied upon personal property belonging to the defendant.

A motion to dissolve the attachment was interposed, a demurrer to the complaint was filed, and thereafter the defendant answered denying all of the material allegations of the complaint.

The cause came on for trial; the plaintiffs were permitted to amend their affidavit for attachment, and after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bingham v. KeylorWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wing Ho v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Peterson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Remington v. FraguliusWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nimey v. NimeyWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API