Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Keylor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1901No. 3634PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Walla Walla County.— Hon. Thomas H. Bbents, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

White, J.

The amended complaint in this action alleged that about the 1st of March, 1889, the plaintiff (respondent) and defendant (appellant) were both medical doctors and surgeons, and that they entered into a copartnership for the purpose of practicing their professions together at Walla Walla, Washington, as equal partners, under the firm name and style of Bingham & Keylor, which *158partnership was to continue during their pleasure* (this partnership continued until October 18, 1897) ; that during said copartnership the defendant, without the assent of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hollister v. SimonsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Vennum v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Sumner v. ReichenikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Brannan v. StraussIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Bingham v. KeylorWashington Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Henderson v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Meisenheimer v. MeisenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Simich v. CuljakWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Johnson v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In Re Estate of TembreullWashington Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API