Legal Opinion

Feddock v. New Jersey Realty Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 27, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

28 N.J. Super. 400 (1953)

101 A.2d 48

JOSEPH M. FEDDOCK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

NEW JERSEY REALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE. EDNA FEDDOCK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

NEW JERSEY REALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 19, 1953.

Decided November 27, 1953.

Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.

Mr. John J. Meehan argued the cause for petitioner (Messrs. Meehan Brothers, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph C. Paul argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Henry M. Grosman, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

This is a workmen's…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grove v. GroveNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Vreeland v. VreelandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CavicchiaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Borough of Westville v. Whitney Home BuildersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Huster v. HusterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. STATE BY McLEAN v. LanzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. Gargano v. VenezioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API