Legal Opinion
Dabin v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 8, 2000No. SC 81595, SC 81815PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANN K COVINGTON, Judge.
Appellants, Steven C. Ressel and James R. Dabin, challenge the validity of section 479.500, RSMo Supp. 1998, 1 which authorizes the establishment of a traffic court, the appointment of traffic judges, and procedures to be followed in the traffic court, and section 302.535, which enables the presiding judge of the circuit court to assign a traffic judge to hear cases pursuant to the provisions of section 479.500. Dabin additionally alleges that he was not lawfully under arrest when he refused to submit to a chemical test to determine the alcohol content of his blood.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Asbury v. LombardiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Moore v. Board of Education of Fulton Public School No. 58Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Jarvis v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Damon v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Reece v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Doughty v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Session v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Winston v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.