Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hord v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1885No. 12,072PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

On the 5th day of June, 1884, the State of Indiana, by the Hon. Francis T. Hord, its attorney general,, presented to and filed with the appellee, for allowance, three separate demands, each containing “ a detailed statement of the items and dates of charge,” against such appellee. Of these demands, the first was for the aggregate sum of $1,-282.96, the second was for the aggregate sum of $1,617.53,. *70and the third was for the aggregate sum of $146. The county board refused to allow the demands or any part thereof, and adjudged that the appellant take nothing thereby, and that the relator “ pay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snelson v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Jameson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Board of Commissioners v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Pfaff v. State ex rel. MaxwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bass Foundry v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Allen v. Comm'rs of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. State v. Portsmouth Savings BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API