Legal Opinion

State v. Kincaid

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*100BROWN, J.

The indictment alleges, in substance, that, on June 15, 1929, without having obtained a license therefor, and contrary to statute, the defendant, for compensation paid to him, unlawfully conducted a public dance in a public dance hall situate in the corporate limits of Gold Hill, a town in Jackson county, Oregon, having a population of less than 500, to wit, 442.

The defendant asserts that the statute involved is unconstitutional, alleging, among other reasons therefor, that dance halls are not subject to regulation by the state. We cannot follow counsel. It is well-established law in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Straw v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Corporation of the Sisters of Mercy v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API