Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Transport Workers Union of Greater New York, Local 100

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Bergan. Judges Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent in the following memorandum: An employee cannot obtain workmen’s compensation if he is injured ip the course of doing a thing forbidden by his employer (Matter of Hyatt v. United States Rubber Reclaiming Co., 256 N. Y. 571, affg. 230 App. Div. 743; Matter of Boggan v. Abby Finishing Co., 11 A D 2d 591). There is no dispute that this was a wildcat strike, as conclusively determined by the executive board of the union.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Hyatt v. U.S. Rubber Reclaiming Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Claim of Hyatt v. United States Rubber Reclaiming Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of DiMeo v. Trinity Health Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  2. Roumeliotis v. ZengaMassachusetts Superior Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API