United States v. George W. Price, United States of America v. Jose Mireles
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
The defendants in the above-styled cases contend, inter alia, that the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to quash the jury panels on the basis of interim jury service in similar cases between the time the panels were selected and the commencement of the trials. We have concluded that although the disposition of this issue should be determined favorably to the defendants according to our recent pronouncements in United States v. Mutchler 1 and United States v. Jefferson, 2 each defendant is entitled to a new trial in any event due to the significant delay…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. SmaldoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Gerald Rojas, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Tarciso Antonio De Alba-ConradoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Edward J. Arlt, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. CapuaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Benjamin F. Gay Iii, Roy M. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Clarence Christian NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- People v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Walter Richard Smith, A/K/A Bobby SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.