Legal Opinion

WYOMING DISCOUNT CORPORATION v. Lámar

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1968No. 3660PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

Catherine Lamar and Newton Lamar, wife and husband, brought suit against Wyoming Discount Corporation and Valley Finance Company claiming defendants on the same day made a loan for $1,000 to Newton Lamar and another loan for $1,000 to Catherine Lamar, making a total of $2,000. Plaintiffs’ claim is that this violated the provisions of the Wyoming Small Loan Act, §§ 13-489 and 13-490, W.S.1957, C. 1965, and that plaintiffs under the act are entitled to recover from defendants all principal and interest paid, amounting to $2,360.15.

On motion of the plaintiffs, the district court granted summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Russell v. CurranWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State v. GallegosWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wheatland Irrigation District v. Two Bar-Muleshoe Water Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Logan v. StannardWyoming Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyles Bros. Drilling Co. v. Orion Industries, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Sunwest Bank of Clovis, N.A. v. ClovisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Boyles Bros. Drilling Co. v. Orion Industries, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. First National Bank, Cortez v. First Interstate Bank, Riverton, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. First National Bank, Cortez v. First Interstate Bank, Riverton, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API