Legal Opinion
Hanley v. Trendway Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 26, 1996No. 94 C 5406PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORDBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christopher Hanley (“Hanley”) brings this action to recover sales commissions allegedly owed him by Defendant Trendway Corporation (“Trendway”). Hanley’s Amended Complaint alleges three theories of recovery: contract, restitution, and interference with prospective advantage. The Court previously dismissed all but the contract claim. Before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment from both Hanley and Trendway.
I. Background
Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are uncontroverted.
On September 5,1989, Trendway contracted with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sepe v. City of Safety HarborDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- CHICAGO UNITED INDUSTRIES, LTD. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010