Legal Opinion

Yocom v. Spalding

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Justice.

The appellant David Spalding claims workmen’s compensation benefits by reason of an injury to one of his eyes. The board found him totally disabled, 90% from the accident and 10% from a pre-existing congenital condition, and made an award on the basis of the 90% portion against the employer alone, absolving the Special Fund. The employer appealed to the circuit court, which remanded the proceeding to the board with directions to make a new award against the employer “not to exceed eleven percent (11%) of the appropriate scheduled benefit and an award against the Special Fund…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. FulkersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  2. Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  3. Young v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  4. Winn Dixie Louisville, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
  5. Griffin v. Booth Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fleming v. WindchyKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Yocom v. LoyKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dealers Transport Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  4. R. C. Durr Co. v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  5. Transport Motor Express, Inc. v. FinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API