Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 6, 1970PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the circuit court held that the Work men’s Compensation Board erred in not adjudging liability against the Special Fund under the apportionment statute, KRS 342.120. The Special Fund appeals to this court and insists that the board’s action was correct. The parties are in agreement concerning the facts. In view of pronouncements in our cases decided subsequent to the time this case was processed by the board, considered by the circuit court, and briefed on this appeal, it is apparent that more fundamental considerations exist than are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York Trust Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. International Harvester Company v. PoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  3. Young v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  4. Cabe v. SkeensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  5. Young v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Young v. FulkersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  2. Young v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  3. Garrett Mining Co. v. NyeKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wells v. BunchKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Yocom v. SpaldingKentucky Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API