Legal Opinion

City of Belleville v. Pfingsten

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. John B. Hay, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

On a hearing in the county court of St. Clair county of the legal objections as to an ordinance for paving with brick, on a concrete foundation, ten blocks of Charles street, in the city of Belleville, the court held that the ordinance providing for said improvement was unreasonable, unjust and oppressive, and therefore void, and an order was entered in accordance with that finding. From this order an appeal was taken to this court.

The sole question decided by the trial court was the unreasonable and oppressive nature of the ordinance. All other matters ruled upon were incidental to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. TrotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. McFarlane v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Belleville v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Carbondale v. ReithIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Crawford v. CassitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Gage v. Village of WilmetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. City of Chicago v. MarshIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API