Moore v. State of Arizona

Appellant was convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape, and from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for a new trial he appeals.

The first error attacks the sufficiency of the information, the charging portion of which reads as follows:

“The said Arthur Moore on or about the 20th day of March, 1939, and before the filing of this information at and in the county of Maricopa, State of Arizona, did then and there, wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously, violently and forcibly make an assault upon one Ida Mae Clark, a female not then and there the wife of the…