Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1940No. Criminal No. 890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

Appellant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit rape and from the judgment, as well as from the orders denying his motion for a new trial and refusing to arrest the judgment, he appeals.

Before entering his plea, the defendant moved to quash the information upon the ground that he had not been legally committed, for the reason that the evidence introduced by the state at the preliminary hearing did not show the commission of the offense of assault with intent to commit rape or in fact establish any reasonable or probable canse for holding him on that charge. The denial of this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Indian Fred v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. People v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. EssmanArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. WooleryArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. LoftisArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API