Legal Opinion

Aston Township v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Aston Township (Employer) and Andrew McPartland (Claimant) each appeal from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) finding that Employer overcompensated Claimant, but that the Workers’ Compensation Act1 (Act) afforded Employer no relief because the overcompensation consisted of reimbursement of Employer’s pro-rata share of fees and expenses stemming from a third-party settlement, a situation not addressed by the Act.

Claimant sustained a work-related injury in 2001 that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Lucey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Gold Star Service, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API