Legal Opinion

Pension Fund of the City of Pittsburgh Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1976No. Appeal, No. 214PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

This is an appeal from an order attaching funds under the control of the City of Pittsburgh Pension Fund.

On July 18, 1974, the lower court issued an order requiring the relator to pay the relatrix $160 per month, representing $150 for support and $10 against accumulated arrearages of $300. When the relator did not make the required payments, the relatrix petitioned for the enforcement of the order. At the hearing on the petition the relator testified that his monthly income consisted of Social Security payments of $244.70 and a retirement pension of $357.50 from the City…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Roviello v. RovielloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. BerfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Stewart's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Parisi v. PHILA. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. BaroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magrini v. MagriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Olson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API