Legal Opinion
Monheim v. Union Railroad
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 20, 2011No. Civil Action 10-913PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONTI, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Defendant Union Railroad Company (“defendant” or “Railroad”) filed a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) the amended complaint filed by plaintiff Lydia Monheim, Administratrix of the Estate of Andrew Monheim (“Estate”). (ECF No. 21.) The Railroad seeks dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) (6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
II. Factual 1 and Procedural Background
On March 16, 2010, Andrew Monheim (“Monheim”), employed as a locomotive engineer by the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BrentMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
- Moncrease v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Bahus v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Lupia v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022