Legal Opinion
Camden Fire Insurance v. Bleem
New York City Court
Decided March 23, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHartzell, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff against defendant to recover damages resulting to an automobile owned and driven by one Burt P. Case, by reason of a collision between the said-automobile of the said Burt P. Case and an automobile owned and driven by the defendant, occurring at the intersection of Sheridan drive and Campbell road in the township of Tonawanda, county of Erie, and State of New York, on the 10th day of August, 1926.
The plaintiff is a foreign corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New Jersey, with its principal office in the city of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Swarthout v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Brighthope Railway Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Melick v. StanleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Record v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Norwalk Foods, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Rosenblatt v. Washington County Cooperative InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993