Legal Opinion

Farley's Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 8, 2002No. LD-97-013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) petitioned to disbar the respondent, Michael J. Farley. Following a hearing, the Judicial Referee (Manias, J.) found by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent violated New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules) 1.15(a)(1), 1.15(a)(2), 1.15(b), 3.4(a), 3.4(c), 8.4(a) and 8.4(c) and recommended disbarment. The respondent concedes that he engaged in the conduct of which he is accused and that his conduct violated the Rules. He argues, however, that several mitigating factors justify a less severe sanction than…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eshleman's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Astles' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Jones' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Doherty's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. Connolly's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feld's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Coddington’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Sheridan's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API