Legal Opinion
SMI Industries, Inc. v. Lanard & Axilbund, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 11, 1979No. Civ. A. 79-830PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
Lanard' & Axilbund, Inc. (L & A) and the corporate predecessor of SMI Industries, Inc. (SMI) entered into a commercial lease. The lease was later assigned to SMI which used the rented area as a clothing factory. SMI defaulted in its rent, and L & A dis-trained and confessed judgment under the lease. A sheriff’s levy and writ of possession were issued, but no distress sale was held. Plaintiff then filed a petition in state court to open the judgment. Although the petition was granted, levies, attachments, and executions remain intact under…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicarelli v. Plymouth Garden ApartmentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Luria Brothers & Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Thomas R. Allen, Jr. And Morton J. Greene, Trading as Economy Industrial Properties, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Schreiner v. McKENZIE TANK LINES, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Bostic v. Ohio River Co. (Ohio DiVision) Basic Pension PlanDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1981
- Allegheny Clarklift, Inc. v. Woodline Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.