Legal Opinion
In re Sharnaza Q.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent failed to preserve his argument that he was not a person legally responsible for the subject children of his two daughters, and we decline to consider it (see e.g. Matter of Saraphina Ameila S., 50 AD3d 378, 379 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 709 [2008]).
The court properly denied respondent’s motions to dismiss these neglect petitions under Family Court Act § 1051 (c). One child was paroled to her mother, and the other was placed with respondent’s mother (the child’s great-grandmother). Respondent repeatedly stated that he wished to have contact with his grandchildren, and he did in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re A.G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re Ameila S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Diana Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Imena V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Quinton GG.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Cherish C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Cherish C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Jayline R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.