Legal Opinion
Sweat v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided June 30, 1982No. CA CR 81-164PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lawson Cloninger, Judge.
Appellants, Russell Sweat and Richard “Bud” Sweat, were charged by amended information with conspiracy to possess a controlled substance, marijuana, with intent to deliver in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-707 (Repl. 1977). After trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty and they were sentenced to five years imprisonment and a fine of $10,000 for each appellant. Appellants now bring this appeal.
Their first point for reversal is that the trial court erred in refusing to allow evidence of video tapes and audio recordings of conversations of Jimmy Snow with two…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Walls v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Sweat Et Al. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sweat Et Al. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.