Legal Opinion

Varsalona v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 21, 2006No. A06A1371PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Elaine and Rocky Varsalona sued their insurer, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, alleging that Auto-Owners breached the terms of a homeowners insurance policy by refusing to pay for property damage to a residence covered by the policy. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Auto-Owners on the basis that the residence was not covered by the policy because the Varsalonas never used it as their residence. For the following reasons, we affirm.

On October 31, 2002, the Varsalonas bought a residence located at 2276 Turtle Landing in Marietta. The Varsalonas allege…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boardman Petroleum, Inc. v. Federated Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. HSI Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Collier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Epps v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Roland v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roberson v. LeoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Ronald Lee v. Mercury Insurance Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. Turner v. GATEWAY INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. C. Ingram Co. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API