Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hetrick v. Roberts

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 22, 1937Published

1DissentPerskie, J.

With all due deference to my colleagues I do not share the views expressed in the opinion of the court below, and adopted here.

The facts are not in dispute. They are fully stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The title of the challenged act is “An act concerning municipalities." Chapter 160, Pamph. L. 1936, p. 372. It is conceded, it is, in fact, expressly provided in the very first paragraph of the act itself that a beach commission shall be appointed in every municipality of the state “under the control of the municipal finance commission, and which shall own the beach and upland…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allison v. CorkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  2. Hourigan v. Township of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Kennedy v. Borough of BelmarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. Merchants' National Bank of Boston v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  5. Johnson v. Mayor of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API