Legal Opinion

Burt v. Chase Auto Finance Corporation

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 21, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00739Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JEREMY S. BURT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-C-739 CHASE AUTO FINANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jeremy Burt commenced this action in state court claiming Defendant Chase Auto Finance Corporation improperly repossessed his vehicle. Reflecting the lack of clarity endemic to American law, the First Amended Complaint (FAC) alleges six overlapping contract, tort, and statutory claims. More specifically, the FAC alleges a violation of Wisconsin’s Uniform Commercial Code, civil theft, invasion of privacy, trespass to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Gutierrez v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API