Chase v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
The petitioner’s sole contention in this application for leave to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is that he is entitled to have time spent by him on parole credited to his original sentence. Whether a person returned to custody for violation of parole is to receive such credit is a matter resting in the discretion of the Board of Parole and Probation. Article 41, section 115, Code (1957). A failure of the Board to exercise its discretion so as to grant credit does not deprive the petitioner of any constitutional *628right, even if we assume, without deciding,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clark v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woods v. SteinerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- State v. EwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Mayo v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Chase v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998