Legal Opinion

Chase v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 21, 1958No. H. C. No. 98PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner’s sole contention in this application for leave to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is that he is entitled to have time spent by him on parole credited to his original sentence. Whether a person returned to custody for violation of parole is to receive such credit is a matter resting in the discretion of the Board of Parole and Probation. Article 41, section 115, Code (1957). A failure of the Board to exercise its discretion so as to grant credit does not deprive the petitioner of any constitutional *628right, even if we assume, without deciding,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woods v. SteinerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  2. State v. EwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Mayo v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Chase v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API