Legal Opinion

Debrey v. Hanna

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

The moving defendants appear specially for the purposes of this motion. The application is made pursuant to subdivision 1 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that this court has no jurisdiction of the person of the defendants Charbonneaux, Hanna and Kramer; the moving defendants are sued as a copartnership doing business under the firm name and style of Burlington Instrument Company. The summons and complaint were served on the defendant Rowland personally pursuant to the provisions of section 229-b of the Civil Practice Act, as the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Suss v. Durable Knit Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1955
  2. Standard Foods Products Corp. v. Vinas Unidas S. ANew York Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cronin v. New England Storage Warehouse Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  4. National Tool Salvage Co. v. National Tool Salvage Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Landaas v. Canister Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API