Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Genender v. Kirkwood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 28, 2016No. 01-15-00058-CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEvelyn V. Keyes, Justice

This suit represents appellant Jamie Genender’s third suit on the same facts. In this suit, Genender appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Larry Kirk-wood and USA Store Fixtures, L.L.C. (“Store Fixtures”) on her claims for DTPA violations, fraud, unfair debt collection practices, and trespass arising out of her purchase of used shelving from Store Fixtures. The majority affirms the summary judgment on all claims except on Genen-der’s fraud claim, which it remands for trial.

I believe the majority’s opinion on Gen-ender’s fraud claim incorrectly construes Civil Practice and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. TrapnellTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API