Legal Opinion
King v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1950No. Civ. 14374PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued to recover on a promissory note which was executed by defendants as final payment for a hotel lease owned by plaintiff. The total price was $6,800 and defendants paid $4,000 cash. Defendants claim that they were defrauded in the transaction, and cross-complained after notice of rescission to plaintiff for the $4,000 already paid.
The only question on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the judgment. There is no conflict over the facts that plaintiff advertised in a local newspaper for the purpose of selling the hotel lease; that the advertisement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Blackman v. HowesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Smith v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific Architects Collaborative v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Elkind v. WoodwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Heifetz v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Rogers v. Bill & Vince's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Pacific Arch. Collaborative v. State of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1979