United States v. Nunez-Rodelo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*812MEMORANDUM *
Ramon Nunez-Rodelo appeals his sentence, imposed after a guilty plea for unlawful reentry by a deported, removed, or excluded alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He asserts that the elements of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) must be pled in the indictment and proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.1 We disagree and affirm.
The indictment here did not specifically charge that Nunez committed an offense under § 1326(b)(2); it charged him under § 1326(a). As the Supreme Court has clearly held, that was proper because § 1326(b)(2) “is a penalty provision, which simply authorizes a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nunez-Rodelo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005