Haims v. Omni Fitness Equipment Specialists, No. 30 84 18 (Feb. 18, 1993)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO JOIN DEFENDANTS This is a motion based on sections 52-102 and 52-572h of the General Statutes to join as defendant the parents of the named plaintiff, Adam Haims. The plaintiffs are Adam Haims, who brought this action by his father, Daniel Haims, for personal injuries, and Daniel Haims, individually, for payment of medical expenses incurred for the minor child. The defendants are the distributor and manufacturer of a home exercise treadmill. The minor plaintiff was injured when…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dzenutis v. DzenutisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bueno v. Duva, No. 305195 (Jul. 9, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vandine v. Marley, No. Cv 95 0124656 (Feb. 15, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996