Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McCorquodale

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1888No. 5969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Milam. Tried below before the Hon. W. E. Collard.

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, Judge.

Appellant contracted with appellees to receive from them at Temple, Texas, on the nineteenth day of May, 1884, five hundred and ninety-three cattle, and furnish cars and transportation to Fort Worth. At the time agreed upon, appellees had their cattle at the place appointed, and tendered them to appellant for shipment, in accordance with the contract. Appellant refused to receive the cattle, until the evening of the twenty-third of May, and this suit was brought to recover three thousand four hundred and eighty-eight dollars damages alleged to have been sustained b3r appellees,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elder, Dempster & Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. Texas Oil Clearing HouseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. FelkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. LemonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Weatherford, M. W. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API