Legal Opinion

Edmanson v. Wilmington & Philadelphia Traction Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 8, 1923No. 131PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

We will consider together the objection that the plaintiff has not set out any particular acts of negligence on the part of the *180defendant as being the cause of the breaking and falling of the electric wire and the failure to allege that the defendant knew or should have known that the wire was broken or fallen down. We consider these two objections together because any allegation of knowledge on the part of the defendant of a broken or fallen wire and the failure to repair the defect after knowledge, would only be material as imputing a specific…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hayden v. Smithville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  2. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Ciociola v. Delaware Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  3. Orta v. Porto Rico Railway Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1927
  4. Cooke v. Elk Coach Line, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
  5. Slack v. Premier-Pabst Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API