Clausen v. Aberdeen Grain Inspection, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
ANDERSON, LEE D., Circuit Judge
(concurring in result in part and dissenting in part).
[¶ 31.] I respectfully dissent as to Issue 1. I concur in the result reached by the majority on Issue 2, and I concur on Issue 3 with the majority’s holding that the prevailing parties should be allowed to recover costs and disbursements.
[¶ 32.] 1. Duty of care AGI owed to Clausen.
[¶ 33.] Upon the filing of a summary judgment motion, the non-moving party must present specific facts showing that a genuine, material issue of fact exists. Benson v. Goble, 1999 SD 38, ¶ 9, 593 N.W.2d 402. Because Mrs. Clausen…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bosak v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Wagner v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- McCubbin Ex Rel. McCubbin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Ashby v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Benson v. GobleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.